This directory organizes VPNHJ routes by region and explains the differences between IEPL dedicated, relay, and direct connections. Choose a route based on your use case first, then consider the exit region and connection type; distance is only one factor.
Supported platformsWindows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux
ROUTE DIRECTORY
View routes by region
The table below shows selected cities and common connection types to illustrate the coverage structure. In practice, choose a route in the client based on the target service region, your current network, and the connection result. Streaming support means the region offers routes intended for that use; it does not guarantee that every platform will identify the same region at all times.
Country or region
City
Route type
Streaming support
Asia-Pacific
Japan
Tokyo
IEPL dedicated
Supported
Japan
Osaka
Relay
Supported
Singapore
Singapore
Relay
Supported
Hong Kong, China
Hong Kong
Direct
Choose by content region
South Korea
Seoul
Relay
Supported
Australia
Sydney
IEPL dedicated
Supported
Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur
Direct
Choose by content region
Thailand
Bangkok
Relay
Choose by content region
North America
United States
Los Angeles
IEPL dedicated
Supported
United States
San Jose
Relay
Supported
United States
New York
Direct
Supported
Canada
Toronto
Relay
Supported
Europe
Germany
Frankfurt
IEPL dedicated
Supported
United Kingdom
London
Relay
Supported
France
Paris
Direct
Supported
Netherlands
Amsterdam
Relay
Supported
Italy
Milan
Direct
Choose by content region
Spain
Madrid
Relay
Choose by content region
Sweden
Stockholm
Direct
Choose by content region
Switzerland
Zurich
Relay
Choose by content region
Other regions
United Arab Emirates
Dubai
Relay
Choose by content region
South Africa
Johannesburg
Direct
Choose by content region
Brazil
São Paulo
Relay
Supported
Chile
Santiago
Direct
Choose by content region
ROUTE TOPOLOGY
Design trade-offs by route type
IEPL dedicated, relay, and direct connections are not simply high-, mid-, and low-tier options. They use different network structures, with different costs, levels of path control, and use cases. Understanding the topology before choosing a route is more reliable than focusing only on the city name.
IEPLControlled path
IEPL dedicated route
An IEPL dedicated route places the main cross-border segment on a more controlled, enterprise-grade connection, making the path between the access and exit points clearer. Its purpose is not to make every network environment perform identically, but to reduce the impact of unpredictable public-network routing on cross-border transmission. For continuous video, remote work, cloud development environments, and long-running data synchronization, connection stability is usually more important than a peak speed from a single short test.
These routes typically cost more network resources than standard relay and direct connections, so they are better suited to sustained connections, jitter-sensitive work, or tasks where failed retries are costly. For briefly opening a webpage or reading text, a nearby relay or direct route may use resources more efficiently. A dedicated route is not the fixed first choice for every situation; it is a clear option when stability matters more.
Suitable for long-lived connections, video calls, and continuous transfers
Suitable for work tasks sensitive to path fluctuations
Cost reflects connection quality and path control
RELAYOptimized entry
Relay route
A relay route first connects to a suitable entry point, which then forwards traffic to the target exit. It addresses a common issue: the direct path from the local network to a distant city may be poor, while the path to a relay entry may be steadier. Splitting the connection allows more flexible coordination between the entry network and the international exit, making relay routes especially useful for cross-continent access, networks with noticeable evening path changes, or unstable direct connections.
Relays add a forwarding step, along with infrastructure and routing costs. Their value is not that more hops are always better, but that they can avoid a poor direct path. When choosing a relay, first check whether the exit region matches the target service, then compare the actual performance of different entries. If a city has multiple relay entries, test them individually instead of judging by the route name alone.
Suitable for cross-continent access and networks with changing paths
Suitable when direct access works but lacks consistency
Cost reflects entry resources and forwarding coordination
DIRECTSimple path
Direct route
A direct route reaches the exit directly from the access network without an intermediate forwarding layer. Its structure is straightforward and works well when the local network already has a good path to the target region. For nearby cities, everyday websites, email, reference searches, and lightweight apps, a direct route is often a sensible starting point. It also simplifies troubleshooting: if the direct result is stable, there is no need to add a relay merely for a more complex route name.
Direct routes are more sensitive to local carrier routing and public-network conditions. The same city may perform differently on different access networks, and a smooth daytime path can change during busy hours. Direct access is therefore best approached as “test, then keep”: after connecting, check real tasks such as loading pages, continuous playback, and signing in to the target tool. Keep the route if it meets your needs; switch to a relay or dedicated route in the same region if you see repeated disconnects or pronounced jitter.
Suitable for everyday browsing and nearby exits
Suitable when the local access path is already stable
Cost focuses on exit resources with a more direct path
SELECTION GUIDE
Choose a route by use case
The right order is “target service region → task → connection type → real-world verification.” A nearby city can help, but the exit region must also match the content, account, and work environment. Choose according to the task requirements first, then consider distance.
BROWSE
Everyday browsing
Everyday websites, document searches, email, and lightweight tools usually do not require a complex route. Start with a nearby direct or relay route, open familiar sites, and move through several pages to check sign-ins, image loading, and file access. If the result is stable, keep using the current route; switching exits frequently may instead trigger unfamiliar-location checks on websites.
When you need content from a specific region, the exit region matters more than physical distance. If the target service requires a US location, choose a US city rather than using an Asian exit simply because it is closer. After finishing the task, switch back to your everyday route to reduce repeated changes in the account region.
STREAMING
Streaming and continuous playback
Streaming depends on sustained transfer, content-region detection, and stability during playback. Confirm the content region first, then choose a supported exit listed in the table. After opening the platform, do not stop at checking whether the homepage loads: play the target content, seek through it, and watch whether quality remains stable. Homepage access does not mean that a specific title uses the same regional authorization.
If playback starts normally but buffers repeatedly, compare relay and IEPL dedicated routes in the same region first. Before switching, fully exit the current playback, establish a new connection, and reopen the platform so the previous region information does not persist in the session. Platforms use different methods to determine region, so choose a route for the content you are watching rather than keeping one “universal exit” permanently.
AI TOOLS
AI Tools
AI tools often depend on web sessions, API connections, account region, and long-form data transfer at the same time. Start with an exit region where the target tool is available, then complete the full workflow: sign in, send a prompt, generate longer content, and handle files. Testing only the homepage can miss later connection issues, especially during long generations or uploads.
If the tool often disconnects during generation, compare relay and IEPL dedicated routes in the same region and keep the option with the steadier connection. Minimize exit-city changes during use so the account session remains consistent. When calling related services from a development environment, use a clear, consistent exit strategy across the browser, command line, and project environment instead of routing different programs through different regions.
GAME
Gaming
Game routing should not be chosen by map distance alone; consider the game server region and the local access path as well. Confirm the account or server region first, then choose an exit in the same or a nearby region. In the game, check connection continuity, input responsiveness, and voice chat rather than judging only by whether the login screen opens.
Keep a direct route when it performs well; if the path becomes unstable during use, try a relay in the same region. An IEPL dedicated route can help when sustained connectivity matters, but the final choice still needs to be verified against the specific game's server deployment. Updates and live matches can also use different routes: downloads favor continuous transfer, while matches depend more on interaction stability.
WORK
Remote work
Remote desktops, video calls, code repositories, enterprise documents, and cloud consoles need predictable long-lived connections. Start with an exit in the same region as the company service or cloud resource, then test joining meetings, pulling repositories, collaborating on documents, and completing authentication. In work scenarios, one disconnection can force a new sign-in or a repeated task, so stability should usually come before short-term speed.
For periods of sustained work, compare IEPL dedicated and relay routes first and keep a backup entry in the same region. A backup route reduces troubleshooting time; it is not a reason to switch constantly. When enterprise access policies apply, follow your organization’s network and account rules and ensure that the exit region and sign-in process meet internal requirements.
OPERATING NOTES
Coverage and real-world results
VPNHJ offers 120+ countries / 250+ routes. Broad coverage provides more regional choices, but the final experience still depends on the local network, exit path, target service, and task type.
A nearby city is not always the right choice
A shorter distance often means a shorter path, but content region, account location, and target-server requirements may call for a different exit. For international websites, start with a nearby region; for platforms tied to a specific region, choose that target region directly. Establish the task constraints first, then consider distance, to avoid repeatedly testing the wrong region.
A route name is not a fixed performance verdict
IEPL dedicated routes emphasize control over the main cross-border segment, relays emphasize coordination between entry and exit, and direct routes emphasize a simple path. These describe topology, not a performance ranking independent of the network environment. The same route can perform differently on different access networks, so selection must return to the real task.
Fewer switches are usually more stable than constant testing
Once you find a route that suits your everyday tasks, keep it for a while. Frequently changing exit cities makes regional changes visible to websites and makes troubleshooting harder. When switching is necessary, keep the target region consistent and compare only connection types or entries so it is easier to identify the source of the difference.
Clients and subscriptions are managed in the dashboard
Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Linux users can obtain the appropriate entries through the user dashboard. Sign in before retrieving clients and subscriptions to avoid copying outdated information. No email address is required; use a username and password. Keep subscription details secure and do not publish them on public pages or forward them to untrusted third parties.